Over-60s not to blame for City Hall decision

Jul 11 2008

Dear Editor, – I did not vote at the last election, which was a shambles.

As a person over-60, I feel guilty in allowing councillors to become political party robots. This, I feel, stifles proper debate incurring a following of the party line no matter the outcome, which in some cases could lead to the wrong decisions.

Independent think tank, Reform Scotland, recommends that key powers should be devolved from councils to local communities also provosts should be elected and held accountable. They also recommend stronger powers to the community council.

By either demolishing the City Hall and replacing it with a lovely square, or retaining the existing building for commerce, councillors would help to strengthen departmental controlled disciplines leading to a greater and stronger leadership. Perhaps an opportunity missed?

Perth has a wonderful waterfront down by the river thanks to the recent flood prevention scheme. It also has a lovely concert hall and the new library extension fits well into present buildings. St John’s Kirk could be spoiled by the much-delayed City Hall development.

Perth may have many historical attractions but this does not make it a city. It needs to complete the motorway all the way round, including a road bridge not a footbridge.

The over-60s are being blamed for not seeing the way forward.

I believe the council needs to seek a greater vision for Perth in the future and not pander to every developer who comes along leading to piece-meal developments.

Only then will Perth one day become a recognised City.

By the way I did enjoy the dancing at the City Hall.

Harry A Pearson,

Perth.